Victorian households spent $14.46 billion on clothing and footwear in the 12 months to May 2026. That is 4.0% more than they spent in the 12 months before it.

Nationally, the same category over the same window came to $52.82 billion, up 5.1%. Same ABS release, same category, same current price basis, same two twelve-month windows on both sides.

Victoria grew about 1.1 percentage points slower than the country it is part of.

One point in one year is easy to wave off. The reason it matters is that it has not been one year.

Victorian against national growth in clothing and footwear spending, twelve months against the prior twelve, January 2024 to May 2026The two lines are level in January 2024. The Victorian line then falls below the national line and stays below it at every reading through to May 2026, dropping as far as 3.3% below the prior year in September 2024 while the national line never falls further than 0.9% below. Both recover, ending at 4.0% for Victoria against 5.1% nationally.0%-3.3% Sep 2024Australia 5.1%Victoria 4.0%Jan 2024Jan 2025May 2026
Victorian against national spending growth on clothing and footwear, January 2024 to May 2026. Each point compares the twelve months to that month end against the twelve months before it. The lines are level in January 2024, and the Victorian line sits below the national one at every reading afterwards. The dashed rule marks zero, where a market is the same size as it was a year earlier.ABS Monthly Household Spending Indicator, May 2026 release, Table 4 (Victoria) and Table 2 (Australia), Clothing and footwear, current price, original series. Checked 11 August 2026.

The gap is 28 readings old

Run that same twelve-months-against-the-prior-twelve comparison at every month end instead of just the latest one. In January 2024 Victoria and the country were level, both up 1.6%.

Victoria has come in below the national rate at every reading since. That is 28 consecutive months, February 2024 through May 2026.

It has not always been this way, and the piece is not that Victoria is structurally slower. At the December 2023 reading Victoria was ahead. The gap opened in early 2024, widened to 2.8 points by the end of that year, and has been closing since.

The move: use the Victorian series when you set a Victorian target, and re-check it every quarter, because a gap that is narrowing makes a correction you set two years ago wrong today.

For 18 of those months, Victoria was going backwards

The gap is not only Victoria growing more slowly. For a long stretch it was Victoria shrinking while the country was not.

On this measure Victorian spending sat below the prior year at every month end from March 2024 to August 2025. Eighteen consecutive readings. The deepest was the September 2024 reading, 3.3% below the year before it.

Nationally, the same measure went negative at only eight of those eighteen month ends, and never further than 0.9% below.

Read that as an owner rather than as a statistic. Through 2024 and the first half of 2025, a Melbourne clothing business holding revenue flat was beating its market. Measured against the national number, that same flat business looked like it was losing ground.

The move: before you conclude anything about how 2024 and 2025 went, re-read them against Victoria. Some of what looked like a problem was the market you are actually in.

Two cuts of the same release, and they agree

There is a second way to cut this, and it is the one that makes the headlines. Through-the-year change compares a single month against the same month a year earlier.

On that cut, Victorian spending in the single month of May 2026 ran 5.4% above May 2025, against 6.6% nationally. A gap of 1.2 points.

The rolling twelve-month cut puts the gap at 1.1 points. Different windows, different numbers, same answer.

Be precise about which one you are quoting, though. That 5.4% is one month against one month, not a year of growth, and setting a single-month figure beside a twelve-month one is how two correct numbers end up looking like a contradiction.

The move: pick one cut and use it on both sides of every comparison you make.

What this is, and what it is not

This is Victorian household spending across the whole clothing and footwear category. It is not Melbourne, it is not retail turnover, and it is not your P&L.

Victoria is the closest published proxy for a Melbourne market, not a measurement of one. Melbourne is most of the state’s spending, and the figure still includes every Victorian household outside it.

Both sides are current price, so price rises sit inside both numbers. That is fair for this comparison because it is equally true of Victoria and the country, but it does mean neither figure is a volume figure. Growing 4.0% is not selling 4.0% more items.

And your own rate will not be the state’s. The point is not that you should have grown 4.0%. It is that the bar you hold yourself to should belong to the market you sell into.

The move: compute your own twelve months against your prior twelve, the same way, before you compare yourself to either number.

Nobody chooses the national number. It arrives by default.

The wrong benchmark is rarely a decision anyone makes. It is usually inherited.

  • An overseas or interstate parent sets one growth target for the whole business, built off a national or global rate.
  • A franchise or buying group circulates a network-wide figure, weighted to wherever most of its stores happen to be.
  • An agency benchmarks your account against its own client base, which is national at best.
  • A category report quotes an Australian number, because an Australian number is the one that exists.

Every one of those is a reasonable figure for whoever produced it. None of them describes the market a Melbourne shopfront actually sells into.

The move: whenever a growth number arrives from somewhere else, ask which geography it covers before you plan against it.

What to change before you set the next target

One substitution, made before the number is committed.

  • Set a Victorian target off the Victorian rate. For the 12 months to May 2026 that is 4.0%, not 5.1%.
  • Pull it yourself rather than taking ours. ABS Monthly Household Spending Indicator: Table 4 is Victoria, Table 2 is Australia by category. Both are free spreadsheets on the release page, and the series is Clothing and footwear, current price.
  • Use one cut on both sides. Either twelve months against the prior twelve, or a single month against the same month last year. Never one of each.
  • Re-check it quarterly. The gap has run from 2.8 points down to 1.1 since the end of 2024, so a correction set in 2024 is already stale.

Name the cost, because there is one. A Victorian benchmark is the smaller number, and if you report to a parent or a board holding a national target, using it means arguing for a lower bar out loud rather than quietly missing a higher one. That is a harder conversation, held earlier. That is the trade.

It also will not rescue a bad year, and it should not be used to. A market running 1.1 points behind explains 1.1 points. If you are fifteen points off the target, the gap is you, and the Victorian number is precisely what lets you tell those two apart.

The target gets set once. Set it against the market you actually sell into.